First Singularity Salon a Success

On 18 March, 2011, in Events, meetup, by Adam A. Ford

Singularity SalonHad a generalised meeting entitled ‘Singularity Salon‘ on a few things futurist at Prudence bar in North Melbourne… A good turnout, had a round table discussion for about 5 hours and in the spirit of St Patrick made plenty of noise.
We spoke about a range of subjects including the Japan nuclear disaster, CEV (Coherent Extrapolated Volition), reflected equilibrium, what the metaphor of the Technological Singularity means (can’t see past the Event Horizon of a black hole) – a definition of what the Singularity is and what it isn’t:
– it isn’t the accelerating returns or technological development that may lead into a Singularity, it isn’t an infinite growth after a Singularity upwards ad infinitum, it isn’t referring to a black hole
– it is more like that IJ Good defined as an Intelligence Explosion, a closing of a feedback loop in which an intelligence intelligently and insightfully optimizes its own intelligence, lather rinse repeat…
We also spoke about a word made up on the spot: ‘enflourishment’, and what that word could mean. Actually found out later that the word really does exist.
Also spoke about the up and coming Humanity Plus summit in Melbourne (first one in Australasia), and the 2nd Singularity Summit AU (also in Melbourne).
Lastly we spoke on the dynamics and biases of conspiracy oriented thinking, floating ideas, some common behaviours associated with orgs like Ralien UFO cults. Also future less wrong meetings in Melbourne.

singularity salonThanks to all those who came along.
We are planning to have more Singularity Salons in the coming months.

Kevin B. KorbIt has lots of nice diagrams, and mathematical formulas.
It covers various topics, inc:
*what would an ai be
*turing tests
*Strong AI
*Ethics of AI
*Weizenbaum’s anti-ai argument
*Ai smarter than us is out of our control, not sharing our motives, constraints and ethics , therefore when humans and AI have a conflict of interests, AI’s win, and humans loose… – and so AI research is unethical
*Counter argument – it is proposed that Ethical AI research is ethical
*Asimov’s stories show his laws of robotics breaking down and not working
*Rewritten Asimov’s laws of robotics
*Ethical Systems
*Deontological Systems (reqires natural language first)
*Virtue Ethics (reqires natural language first)
*Egoism (hollywood)
*Utilitarianism (shown as the ethical and feasible one)
*Consciousness of AI makes it an agent deserving of free will
*Building an Ethical AI would:
*Help solve 21st century risks
*Its progeny would most likely be Ethical as well

The file is in PDF format here: Kevin Korb – aiethics

Tagged with: